Judicial selection, 2022

  • Elected

  • Appointed

  • Combination

Judicial specialization, 2022

  • All mixed case types

  • Mostly mixed

  • Mostly specialized

Caseload assignment, 2022

  • Mixed assignment methods

  • Individual discretion

  • Statute/State court rules

Judicial experience, training, and tools, 2022

  • Qualification Requirements

  • Required Annual Training

  • Required Risk/Need Assessments and Pre-Dispositional Reports

  • Juvenile Justice Bench Books

Courtroom shackling, 2015

Restricted by judiciary

In Idaho, State v. Doe, 333 P.3d 858 (2014) held that juveniles be afforded the same rights as adults to be free from physical restraints at a juvenile evidentiary hearing [adjudication hearing] absent a finding of necessity on a case-by-case basis.

Competency, 2015

Idaho has juvenile competency statutes which align with the Dusky standard. Procedures include hearing requirements for court-appointed evaluators, timelines, and elements the report must contain to assist with the decision. Examiners are to follow their respective professional guidelines for similar reports, and non-appointed examinations meeting criteria are expressly permitted. Additional requirements exist when developmental disabilities are suspected. Involuntary treatment can be ordered for 180 additional days if the report concludes ‘there is a substantial probability that the defendant will be fit to proceed in the foreseeable future.’

  • No juvenile standard

  • Juvenile standard is the adult standard

  • Juvenile justice standard exists

  • JJ standard includes developmental immaturity

About this project

Juvenile Justice GPS (Geography, Policy, Practice, Statistics) is a project to develop a repository providing state policy makers and system stakeholders with a clear understanding of the juvenile justice landscape in the states.

Continue reading »


Tell us what you think of JJGPS. Questions, feedback, or other comments are welcomed.

Questions or feedback »

Follow on Twitter »