Judicial selection, 2022

  • Elected

  • Appointed

  • Combination

Judicial specialization, 2022

  • All mixed case types

  • Mostly mixed

  • Mostly specialized

Caseload assignment, 2022

  • Mixed assignment methods

  • Individual discretion

  • Statute/State court rules

Judicial experience, training, and tools, 2022

  • Qualification Requirements

  • Required Annual Training

  • Required Risk/Need Assessments and Pre-Dispositional Reports

  • Juvenile Justice Bench Books

Courtroom shackling, 2015

Restricted by judiciary

In California, Tiffany A. v. Superior Court, 150 Cal. App. 4th 1334 (2007) prohibited the routine use of restraints. The disposition directed that use of restraints must be implemented on a case-by-case basis.

Competency, 2015

California case law held that the competency standard in (adult) criminal proceedings applies to juvenile delinquency proceedings. Juvenile statute affirms this, requiring that the Judicial Council adopt court rules for qualifying expert evaluators. There are additional requirements if deemed incompetent due to developmental disability.

  • No juvenile standard

  • Juvenile standard is the adult standard

  • Juvenile justice standard exists

  • JJ standard includes developmental immaturity

About this project

Juvenile Justice GPS (Geography, Policy, Practice, Statistics) is a project to develop a repository providing state policy makers and system stakeholders with a clear understanding of the juvenile justice landscape in the states.

Continue reading »

Feedback

Tell us what you think of JJGPS. Questions, feedback, or other comments are welcomed.

Questions or feedback »

Follow on Twitter »